Urban Stories : Anthologie 1. Le Sang de la trahison. Des clous dans le coeur. Continue shopping. Item s unavailable for purchase. Please review your cart. You can remove the unavailable item s now or we'll automatically remove it at Checkout. Remove FREE. Un large champ de sujets qui associent rigueur journalistique, exigence Avec une Bon voyage!
Un inventaire animalier. Portrait intime de Francis Cabrel. Qui est cet homme discret, qui se tient en retrait du monde et dont les chansons font parties de notre patrimoine culturel? Difficile de savoir qui est vraiment ce Francis Et de fait, les pierres Nous explorons avec lui ses blessures du temps, celles avec Ici, elle sculpte, choisit les plus belles Ensemble, ils Albert Sauteur est Leur vie en sera Antonins est artisan-chercheur. Comment diriger un ensemble sans chef? La musique martiniquaise tient ses origines des musiques venues d'Afrique et d'Europe.
Il faut intervenir pour lui donner une autre vie. Et bien suivez-moi sur les routes de France et profitez du voyage que mon contrebassiste et moi avons entrepris pour reconstituer mon histoire. Ces artistes majeurs ont Seul avec Laurent Dauptain dans son atelier. Il peint un immense autoportrait de xcm.
Le style Tiki se retrouve Tandis qu'il dessine, Velickovic se raconte. Tandis qu'il peint, Velickovic se raconte et raconte son travail. Devant lui, une page blanche. La France est en deuil. Son chapeau, ses L'enjeu de ce film Un format Au Royal Palace, le rythme des saisons fait partie du spectacle, bien loin des agitations nocturnes de la En , il attira 40, participants. A travers le Deux villes, deux quartiers, six artistes.
Un canot de sauvetage dans la brume. Un enjeu Pour trouver sa route sur les mers du monde, le marin choisit de Meilleurs spots, tendances, portraits de champions, Destination Glisse vous embarque dans un road trip palpitant. Le premier saut en base jump de Tomer Sisley! Qui sont et comment AIR F. Dans des conditions Pourquoi ce jeune homme a-t-il voulu relever un pari aussi dingue? Les yeux dans les bleus version ski freestyle! Il nous Et au milieu, le restaurant "Chez Hortense" : inusable, incontournable, hors du temps.
Dans ce contexte, comment les forces de l'ordre font-elles respecter la loi? Mais alors pourquoi au Chili? Tout ce qui Les sauveteurs de la plage nous rappellent Bush est originaire des Comores. Son combat pour la protection des roussettes et de la Le voyage dure normalement 12h mais Il est certainement l'artiste malgache le plus connu en occident.
La plupart de son temps, Marco le passe dans un coin unique, un joyau basque serti entre mer et montagne ; au large du port de Saint Jean de Luz. Par ce Pour les populations agricoles malgaches qui vivent souvent dans un total isolement et ne Une ville face au changement climatique! Pour les habitants, scientifiques et politiques locaux, une course En cause : le Abou Simbel, 8eme merveille du monde! Marqueurs d'un monde en constante Retour sur une aventure alimentaire et Octobre En quelques jours, prisonniers arrivent dans la centrale.
Eva Tichauer, juive de Quelles sont les raisons qui Un document intense, On les appelait les marraines. Des groupes ethniques et religieux vivaient sur le Levant pendant des She may be right …. The Council on Foreign Relations estimates that U. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports that up to 4, people have been killed — just in Pakistan and Yemen alone — between and So — altogether — the number of people killed by drone is probably well above five thousand. The West is intentionally targeting farmers, small-time drug dealers and very low-level Taliban members with drone assassination.
And people are targeted for insanely loose reasons. As the New York Times reported in But some State Department officials have complained to the White House that the criteria used by the C. The joke was that when the C. Men loading a truck with fertilizer could be bombmakers — but they might also be farmers, skeptics argued.
Critics correctly find many problems with this program, most of all the number of civilian casualties the strikes have incurred. Sourcing on civilian deaths is weak and the numbers are often exaggerated, but more than civilians are likely to have died from the attacks. That number suggests that for every militant killed, 10 or so civilians also died. In Iraq, over 70 percent of those who died of direct war violence have been civilians. Civilians usually suffer the most casualties. No wonder people all over the world are overwhelmingly opposed to drone strikes.
Indeed, even the CIA admits that the drone program might be counter-productive in fighting terrorism. Obama has increased the number of drone attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere. Indeed, most people who have looked at the numbers believe that Obama has killed many more civilians with drone attacks than Bush did using the same method.
The former constitutional law teacher may or may not know that drone attacks are a war crime more here and here. Combat operations in Afghanistan may be coming to an end, but a look at secret NATO documents reveals that the US and the UK were far less scrupulous in choosing targets for killing than previously believed. Drug dealers were also on the lists. Death is circling above Helmand Province on the morning of Feb. The pilot has orders to kill him. The document lists enemy combatants the alliance has approved for targeted killings. But visibility is poor and the helicopter is forced to circle another time.
But he has lost sight of the mullah during the maneuver, and the missile strikes a man and his child instead. The boy is killed instantly and the father is severely wounded. The child and his father are two of the many victims of the dirty secret operations that NATO conducted for years in Afghanistan. The documents show that the deadly missions were not just viewed as a last resort to prevent attacks, but were in fact part of everyday life in the guerilla war in Afghanistan.
Some Afghans were only on the list because, as drug dealers, they were allegedly supporting the insurgents. The year combat mission in Afghanistan comes to an official end this week, but the kill lists raise legal and moral questions that extend far beyond Afghanistan. Can a democracy be allowed to kill its enemies in a targeted manner when the objective is not to prevent an imminent attack? And does the goal of eliminating as many Taliban as possible justify killing innocent bystanders?
Different rules apply in war than in fighting crime in times of peace. But for years the West tied its campaign in Afghanistan to the promise that it was fighting for different values there. A democracy that kills its enemies on the basis of nothing but suspicion squanders its claim to moral superiority, making itself complicit instead. The president wanted to end the engagement in Iraq as quickly as possible, but in Afghanistan his aim was to win.
After Obama assumed office, the US government opted for a new strategy. McChrystal promoted the aggressive pursuit of the Taliban. Obama sent 33, additional troops to Afghanistan, but their deployment was tied to a demand that military officials provide a binding date for the withdrawal of US forces. At the same time, the president distanced himself from the grand objectives the West had proclaimed when it first marched into Kabul.
Its new main objective was to fight the insurgency. This marked the beginning of one of the bloodiest phases of the war. Some 2, civilians died in Afghanistan in Two-thirds of them were killed by insurgents and 25 percent by NATO troops and Afghan security forces. The number of operations against the Taliban rose sharply, to between 10 and 15 a night.
Petraeus outlined three stages in fighting guerilla organizations like the Taliban. The first was a cleansing phase, in which the enemy leadership is weakened. After that, local forces were to regain control of the captured areas. The third phase was focused on reconstruction. Under Petraeus, a merciless campaign began to hunt down the so-called shadow governors and local supporters aligned with the Islamists. For the Americans, the fact that the operations often ended in killings was seen as a success.
In August , Petraeus proudly told diplomats in Kabul that he had noticed a shifting trend. The figures he presented as evidence made some of the ambassadors feel uneasy. At least insurgent commanders, Petraeus explained, had been neutralized in the last three months, for an average of about four killings a day. The documents that have now become accessible provide, for the first time, a systematic view of the targeted killings.
They outline the criteria used to determine who was placed on the list and why. The case of an Afghan soldier named Hussein, number 3, on the list, shows how coldly NATO sometimes treated the lives of suspects. A corporal in the Afghan army, he had allegedly deserted and was now on the run, presumably to join the Taliban. NATO officials placed him on the list in the summer of , as one of individuals at the time. The NATO soldiers discussed the pros and cons of his killing. But, the internal assessment continues, a disadvantage of killing the deserter was that any information Hussein might have would be lost.
In the end, the respective ISAF regional commander decided whether a suspect should be added to the list. Some of the JPEL candidates were only listed as being under observation or to be taken into custody. Noor, an ethnic Tajik and former warlord, had become wealthy through smuggling in the turmoil of war, and he was seen as someone who ruthlessly eliminated his enemies. He was listed as number 1, on the NATO list and given a priority level of three, but NATO merely collected information about Noor, rather than placing him on the kill list.
When an operation could potentially result in civilian casualties, ISAF headquarters in Kabul had to be involved. If more potential civilian casualties were anticipated, the decision was left up to the relevant NATO headquarters office. Bodyguards, drivers and male attendants were viewed as enemy combatants, whether or not they actually were. Only women, children and the elderly were treated as civilians. Even officers who were involved in the program admit that these guidelines were cynical.
The documents suggest that sometimes locating a mobile phone was all it took to set the military machinery in motion. As one document states, Predator drones and Eurofighter jets equipped with sensors were constantly searching for the radio signals from known telephone numbers tied to the Taliban. The hunt began as soon as the mobile phones were switched on.
A sophisticated mechanism was activated whenever a number was detected. If the pattern matched, preparations for an operation could begin. The attacks were so devastating for the Taliban that they instructed their fighters to stop using mobile phones. The document also reveals how vague the basis for deadly operations apparently was. In the voice recognition procedure, it was sufficient if a suspect identified himself by name once during the monitored conversation.
This greatly increased the risk of civilian casualties.
à : to, toward, towards
Probably one of the most controversial decisions by NATO in Afghanistan is the expansion of these operations to include drug dealers. In the opinion of American commanders like Bantz John Craddock, there was no need to prove that drug money was being funneled to the Taliban to declare farmers, couriers and dealers as legitimate targets of NATO strikes. This led to heated discussions within NATO. The top-secret dossier could be highly damaging to the German government.
For years, German authorities have turned over the mobile phone numbers of German extremists in Afghanistan to the United States. At the same time, the German officials claimed that homing in on mobile phone signals was far too imprecise for targeted killings. This is apparently an untenable argument. According to a NSA presentation, Center Ice was not just used to share intelligence about mobile phone conversations, but also information about targets. This restrictive approach has led to numerous disagreements with the Americans.
For the Germans, a target could only be added to the list if the individual had ordered, prepared or participated in attacks. The Germans repeatedly urged their allies to remove suspects from the list. In September , only 11 of the targets were associated with northern Afghanistan, which the Germans controlled.
The classified documents could now have legal repercussions. The human rights organization Reprieve is weighing legal action against the British government. Reprieve believes it is especially relevant that the lists include Pakistanis who were located in Pakistan. A new chapter begins in Afghanistan next week. A new government has been elected, and the majority of NATO troops have been withdrawn. It is now up to the Afghans to decide what their future will look like. The West has achieved some of its goals. Al-Qaida has been defeated, at least in Afghanistan, and its former leader, Osama bin Laden, is dead.
But the Taliban remains undefeated, as it demonstrated with the recent attack on a Pakistani school. It will be impossible to bring peace to Afghanistan without involving the Taliban. A CIA study that addresses targeted killings of senior enemy officials worldwide reaches a bitter conclusion. Jeff Bachman. Reprieve thoroughly answers that question. In attempting to kill 41 identified men, as many as 1, people may have been killed or — according to Bureau of Investigative Journalism research — one quarter of the total 4, people killed in drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.
Twenty-four of the 41 men targeted were in Pakistan. In the numerous attempts on their lives, others were killed of whom were children. This bears repeating. In an effort to assassinate 24 men, children were killed. The attempts to target these four resulted in others killed, including children.
Three of the four men are likely still alive, and the fourth is the man who died of natural causes previously mentioned. Questionable legality What does all this mean? Whether we apply international humanitarian law also known as the laws of war or international human rights law, it seems clear that the Obama administration has egregiously violated international law. The Obama administration insists that international humanitarian law IHL is the applicable law because it claims the US is involved in an armed conflict. IHL has weaker restraints on the use of lethal force than does international human rights law, but it does require that lethal force be discriminate and proportionate.
The principles of distinction and proportionality are recognized as customary law and are codified by the Geneva Conventions. The principle of distinction requires that when determining whether to launch an attack against a perceived threat, civilians must be distinguished from combatants. However, I would argue that the repeated attempts to kill each of these 41 men, despite the large number of innocent people being killed, demonstrate that these were not isolated incidents carried out by rogue drone pilots.
This does not mean that human rights law restricts the use of lethal force against known participants in hostilities. What it does mean, however, is that the most fundamental of human rights -— the right to life —- is not discarded when waging war. Yet, the Obama administration has arbitrarily deprived hundreds of children of their lives in attempts to kill 41 men.
This act of terror angers and shakes all people of conscience, and we condemn it in the strongest terms possible. The perpetrators must be brought to justice. Will the debate be framed as one over the effectiveness of drone strikes? Or, rather, over the immorality and illegality of treating innocent civilians — including children — as expendable objects?
Fait rare, la Maison Blanche a fait son mea culpa le lendemain. La raison? Commentators have denounced it as being simplistic and giving a one-sided portrayal of the conflict. In Iraq, the movie has come as a reminder of the vast gulf that divides Iraqi and U. The movie also omitted to note that some Iraqis worked with the Americans, said Sarmad Moazzem, 32, who was one of them. He served alongside U. He listed numerous inaccuracies, such as the identification of Sadr City, the Baghdad neighborhood where Shiite militias battled U.
That scene, in which a child picks up a rocket-propelled-grenade launcher, provoked a furious outburst at one of the screenings of the film. Three spectators sitting in the front row jumped up from their seats and started cursing, said Mohammed Laith, 27, who was sitting a few rows behind. After the three refused to sit down, security guards ejected them from the theater, he said. Nonetheless, many Iraqis seem to have seen it, mostly on Internet downloads. And not all found it objectionable.
He said there was nothing in the film that gave him offense. She has spent more than 15 years covering the Middle East, including the Iraq war. Other postings include Africa, China and Afghanistan. All the facts were supplied by Szmul Zygielbojm, a member of the Polish government in exile who made it his mission to inform the world about the Holocaust. After arriving in London in , Zygielbojm used a clandestine network of contacts across occupied Poland to gather eyewitness accounts of the fate of Jews.
The story methodically lists the death toll from massacres in seven different towns and cities. The total number slaughtered in this district and around Lithuanian Kovno is , Post-war investigation established that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed in mass shootings in Nazi-occupied areas of the former Soviet Union — just as this story made clear. But he was dismayed by the lack of public reaction. Yet Zygielbojm detected no wave of revulsion sufficient for the Allies to take special steps to obstruct the Holocaust. Both died during the razing of the Ghetto in Crushed by this tragedy — and by the weight of indifference towards the fate of the Jews — Zygielbojm took his own life on May 11, By looking on passively upon this murder of defenceless millions tortured children, women and men they have become partners to the responsibility.
Tragic story of heroic Jew who exposed the holocaust to the world… then killed himself after his wife and son were murdered in Warsaw Ghetto uprising Szmul Zygielbojm was the first to reveal full horror of the Holocaust in Adam Luck. Just a year later, the Jewish activist took his own life in his London apartment when he realised that Allied leaders and world opinion could not or would not do anything to stop the horror.
To compound his despair Zygielbojm had learnt that his own wife and child had perished at the hand of the Nazis during the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto in the early part of Born in eastern Poland, Zygielbojm became heavily active within Jewish trade unions and when Germany invaded Poland in he took part in organising the Warsaw defence committee.
48booklist Read Free Books & Download eBooks mudywehy.tk
When the Nazis ordered Jewish leaders to help with the creation of a ghetto in the Polish capital, Zygielbojm publicly opposed the command — and was subsequently smuggled out of the city. After travelling to Belgium, France and the US, where he spoke at a series of meetings to raise awareness about the plight of Jews, he eventually found himself in London in March Realising that he was dealing with a sceptical non-Jewish public, Zygielbojm used British newspapers and the BBC to pass on detailed information he was being supplied with from occupied Europe.
One of the key pieces in this jigsaw was the Christian Jan Karski, who was the link between the Polish underground resistance and the Polish government in exile in London. When he was in the Warsaw Ghetto, Karski relied on a guide called Leon Feiner, who also belonged to the Bund, the same Jewish left-wing organisation that Zygielbojm was a member of.
But when Karski relayed the situation to the British and American governments, as well as Zygielbojm, in late it became clear that the Allies were unable or unwilling to act. Tell them not to leave until they obtain guarantees that a way has been decided upon to save the Jews. Let them accept no food or drink, let them die a slow death while the world is looking on. Let them die. This may shake the conscience of the world. Ironically this happened just as the Jewish resistance rose up the Warsaw Ghetto despite facing overwhelming numbers of well armed Nazi troops.
An estimated 13, Jews died during the uprising and the 50, or so survivors were immediately shipped to extermination camps.
In May, Zygielbojm realised that the Allies were not going to act and then, to compound his despair, he learnt that his wife Manya and son Tuvla had died in Warsaw. That month he took an overdose of sodium amytal at his home in west London and left a long and detailed suicide note, explaining his decision to take his own life. I was not permitted to fall like them, together with them, but I belong with them, to their mass grave.
But he also issued a parting shot in the direction of world opinion and the Allied leaders who had singularly failed to act in any shape or form to try and bring a halt to the slaughter. My comrades in the Warsaw ghetto fell with arms in their hands in the last heroic battle. I realised at that time at that time that everything is lost for the Jews. He was a soldier to the end. Yes, he was a genuine martyr. Joseph became a leading light in the Polish resistance during the war and eventually made his way to the US where he became a scientist in the US space programme before he died in There the Germans slaughtered approximately 1.
Its mention evokes notions of evil and instant horror. Auschwitz was a death factory, an oxymoron that would have made no sense before the Holocaust, but that now is effortlessly comprehensible. But Auschwitz is also misunderstood — and that misunderstanding distorts what we think about the Holocaust, and about the Nazis themselves.
Historical and popular accounts of the Holocaust tend to emphasize its brutal, bureaucratic efficiency, with Auschwitz as its technological pinnacle, whose industrial scale was not only emblematic of, but also necessary for, its success. But as existentially troubling as Auschwitz was and is, and as lethally portentous as it would have been had Nazi Germany won World War II, it was technically unnecessary for the commission of the Holocaust.
Had the Nazis never created gassing installations at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor and elsewhere, they would still have killed around the same number of Jews and non-Jews. About half of the roughly six million Jews whom the Germans and their European collaborators slaughtered, and virtually all the millions of non-Jews the Germans murdered, they killed by nonindustrial means, mainly by shooting or starving them to death.
The Nazi leadership created death factories not for expeditious reasons, but to distance the killers from their victims. Previous and subsequent genocidal assaults also belie the once reflexively intoned notion that modern technology made the Holocaust possible. In Rwanda in , the Hutu perpetrators killed , Tutsi at a more intensive daily rate than the Germans did the Jews, using only the most primitive technological means, mainly machetes, knives and clubs.
And even though we all recognize that genocides can be unleashed without such advanced systems, people still too often assume that true eliminationism, with the intention of completely destroying another group, takes a relatively rare constellation of a state apparatus and technological means. To understand the politics of mass murder and eliminationism, the technical means of carrying out the deed are almost never the central issue. This, rather than its technical specifications, is why Auschwitz is so important. Auschwitz is a symbol of the broader, and little understood, racist revolution that the Germans were bringing about in Europe that sought to overturn the fundamentals of Western civilization, including its core notion of a common humanity.
It reveals that during the Holocaust, mass annihilation, as genocide always is, was part of a larger eliminationist agenda and, at its core, a mechanism for social and political transformation. They should also realize that they are gazing into the abyss that would have consumed their Continent and the world. Froideur comptable. Aucune haine. Le chaos est total. A ce propos, permettez-moi une remarque. Lisez le livre en question et comparez avec ce que dit le monsieur :.
Les S. Que vont-ils devenir? Mais que feront ma femme et mes enfants? The most lethal sniper in American history, Kyle is credited with confirmed kills during his four tours of duty in Iraq. Kyle also described his very first kill in Iraq — a woman trying to blow up advancing Marines with a hidden grenade. So we tried to radio the Marines to let them handle it.
The best films about the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts have been movies that are as concerned about the home front as they are about the field of battle. Kyle offers a readymade hero. He is driven by a sincere pride of country matched with a strong drive and sense of purpose provided by the military. It also turns out he is a good shot. And he discovers other hidden talents — a razor-sharp focus, fidelity to his fellow soldiers, and fearlessness — that make him uniquely lethal in the field of battle. In the field of battle, Kyle is unstoppable. In a number of high-energy action sequences, American Sniper can feel like a well-made, if somewhat rudimentary action flick, replete with some cheesy G.
Joe-style dialogue. Kyle kills bad guys just at the right time; he leads platoons of grunts into buildings and roots out the bad guys; we watch him get in and out of jams and melodramatic showdowns. Kyle kills to save lives — that much Eastwood wants to make extremely clear with these high-tension shoot-out scenes. As we follow Kyle through successive tours, we begin to see the cost of war on his life, family, and psyche. He is distant to friends and family; he and his wife begin to fight. Cooper does a great job of slowly receding into himself.
His speaking turns to grunts, and his posture and demeanor reflect an unspoken, unbearable weight of life at home. He is good at what he does, and he wants to do it and help his buds. But it also becomes obvious that he suffers from something many soldiers have described about their experience returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. The mundane everyday no longer seems like living when compared to the intense life-and-death reality of the field of battle.
As they chat, a young Iraqi boy is dragged into a square by fighters and executed in front of his family. In the mayhem that ensues, Kyle drops his phone, and his wife stands on a suburban street in Texas listening to the hell of the firefight unfold through her cellphone. The scene is so emotionally wrought, so melodramatic, it almost feels garish and overdone. This disconnect seems to be at the heart of what Eastwood is trying to work out in American Sniper. How can someone trained to excel in the field of combat adjust to life after combat?
It is an ancient concern of war literature, going all the way back to Homer. Here, Eastwood approaches it through the lens of a society that continually honors and praises its troops, dragging them out to sporting events and sticking bumper stickers on cars, and yet, a society that, at the same time, has never been more insulated to the intimacies and costs of war. Yes, we support our troops.
We honor our fallen. Our soldiers have done heroic, important work. Likewise, in the movie when Kyle drops his satellite phone during a firefight, his wife was listening in from a sidewalk in front of a medical facility she had just exited. These might seem like minor points, but when the author cannot be counted on to get the minor points right it diminishes the strength of his entire message.
That movie portrayed the expert Zaitsev as a hero in trying to cut down Wehrmacht officers and soldiers on behalf of the Soviet cause. Nor did Moore et al. La pomme de discorde? Bradley Cooper est sensationnel. Bravo Clint Eastwood. Et ces gens sont haineux et simplets. American Sniper nourrit les passions. Que lui reprochent notamment Michael Moore et Seth Rogen?
Dans ce monde, American Sniper est une anomalie. Il montre la vie de Kyle sans fard et sans jugement. Le site Metacritic. Military History William Morrow, Son aura et son entregent lui avaient permis de transformer rapidement son entreprise en business lucratif. Les apparences sont trompeuses. Ce furent ses deux tirs les plus difficiles. De partout, les sollicitations affluent. Rorke Denver WSJ. But not all the attention has been positive.
The most vocal criticism came in the form of disparaging quotes and tweets from actor-director Seth Rogen and documentary-maker Michael Moore. Both have since attempted to qualify their ugly comments, but similarly nasty observations continue to emanate from the left. Chris had always been a large figure in the SEAL teams. He became a legend before our eyes in Ramadi. My fellow special-operations brothers might be shocked, but I think the comments by Messrs. The criticism misses the fundamental value that snipers add to the battlefield. Snipers engage individual threats. Rarely, if ever, do their actions cause collateral damage.
Snipers may be the most humane of weapons in the military arsenal. The job also takes a huge emotional toll on the man behind the scope. The intimate connection between the shooter and the target can be hard to overcome for even the most emotionally mature warrior. The value of a sniper in warfare is beyond calculation. They struck psychological fear in our enemies and protected countless lives.
Chris Kyle and the sniper teams I led made a habit of infiltrating dangerous areas of enemy-controlled ground, established shooting positions and coordinated security for large conventional-unit movement. These small sniper teams pulled the trigger at their own risk. If their position was discovered, they had little backup or support. We have access to, and train with, the latest elite weapons. Advanced drone platforms are at our disposal and wreak havoc on our enemies. The full complement of American battlefield ingenuity and capacity is at our disposal.
Our enemies the world over know this well. They have experienced this awesome power and respect it. But every U. The Taliban, al Qaeda, Islamic State, jihadists everywhere—all those who oppose us fear and hate this weapon, and are haunted by its power to stop their own twisted plans for the world. What is this weapon? It was written long ago by leaders of astonishing foresight and courage.
It is what men like Chris Kyle fight and die for. When Seth Rogen and Michael Moore exercise this right, it is a tribute to those who serve. Denver, a commander in the U. January 23, As Americans, we are fortunate to have the right to speak our minds. Moore obviously has the same freedom of speech right that all Americans do. Some of what he has publicly stated in the past is opinion, some is fact and some is absolutely ludicrous.
To begin with, the reason Americans have the freedom of speech Moore was exercising is because brave men such as Kyle and other active-duty personnel and military veterans have fought to protect this precious right. Kyle either trained for war or was deployed in war zones for more than days a year during his service in the SEAL teams.
SEAL wives basically raise their children alone. The divorce rate for SEALs is incredibly high. Many of the guys have been married multiple times. The children grow up not really knowing their dads because the dads go on frequent and often back-to-back deployments to war zones. These guys seldom know when they are leaving or for how long. After returning home from a deployment, these guys immediately go back to work preparing for the next deployment.
Some are not so fortunate and are wounded or killed in the line of duty. A sniper, who operates behind enemy lines, has one of the most demanding and dangerous duties in the Special Operations community. Snipers operating in Iraq, Afghanistan and a host of other countries often must crawl and make their way through treacherous urban or desert war-zone terrain for hours just to reach their position undetected, a position of over-watch, cover and concealment. Once they are on site, they sometimes stay in their position for days on end waiting for follow-on orders. Military snipers are not sociopaths, coldblooded killers.
Their target hit lists typically include terrorists or people preparing to cause grave harm or death to the innocent. David Grossman uses the analogy of wolves, sheep and sheepdogs. These are the majority of people and do not want to cause harm to others; they wish to live peacefully. Fortunately, there are brave men and women who sacrifice much to protect those who wish to live day to day in peace. These protectors are the community sheepdogs. Chris Kyle was a champion sheepdog.
Every wolf he put down was no longer capable of causing harm or death to the sheep, the innocents. As much as I try to keep my mind open to all viewpoints — from the far left to the far right — I can only reach the conclusion that Michael Moore has no idea what he is talking about. His unfounded comments could not be further from the truth. I would go so far as to say if Moore would simply attend a one-day sniper-training course in the United States, his opinion would drastically change.
Yes, of course, he has the right to say whatever he wishes, but when a guy like Moore has the pulpit and the attention of the media, he should have a moral obligation to speak only on topics in which he has some basic knowledge of the facts. Chris Kyle is an American war hero who has been credited and awarded for saving countless American and innocent lives. After what he did for our country, after all of his sacrifices, Kyle decided to get out of the Navy and assist those brothers in arms who returned from overseas with post-traumatic stress disorder.
How incredibly sad and ironic that in February , Kyle was killed and shot in the back, police say, by a former Marine suffering with PTSD whom he was trying to help and mentor. Michael Moore, tell me: How was Chris Kyle a coward? How are snipers cowards? When Kyle was killed, he left his loving and devoted wife, Taya, behind.
The movie illustrates the real-life story of heroism, patriotism and self-sacrifice of a remarkable American war hero. But I saw it as an honor. Kyle joins the elite ranks of other American sniper icons such as Carlos Hathcock, who was credited with 93 confirmed kills during the Vietnam War. Hathcock felt the same as Kyle did when it came to taking out threats. He simply understood that he was protecting his fellow Marines and other innocent people. If there were not people like Kyle and Hathcock protecting our freedoms, Michael Moore, along with the rest of us, would live in a much more dangerous world.
I remain deeply honored and humbled to be an American and to have been part of a community where heroes like Kyle have served. Then he had to come home.
Pavé Littérature 2015
Michael J. He was driving his supercharged black Ford F outfitted with black rims and oversize knobby mudding tires. He had just left the Navy and moved back to Texas. Two guys approached him with pistols and demanded his money and the keys to his truck. With his hands in the air, he sized up which man seemed most confident with his gun. Kyle knew what confidence with a gun looked like. He was the deadliest sniper in American history.
He survived six IED attacks, three gunshot wounds, two helicopter crashes, and more surgeries than he could remember. He told the robbers that he just needed to reach back into the truck to get the keys. He turned around and reached under his winter coat instead, into his waistband. With his right hand, he grabbed his Colt He fired two shots under his left armpit, hitting the first man twice in the chest.