If you DO know who made that report and aren't saying, then you definitely are part of A conspiracy because you're covering up facts. Given that the collapse of building 7 is probably the most damnign evidence that SOMETHING was awry with the official story even more so than the miraculously ridiculous assertions of the survival of passports while the black boxes didn't survive, there definitely IS a story here sir, and if you choose to ignore it, then your credibility as a news agency is Yes it is.
But if you had any integrity you'd suck it up, and report the story regardless. After all, isn't that what a news agency is supposed to do? Or is saving face a higher priority than investigating and reporting? I can tell by this latest blog that you are still on damage control trying to find a way out of this mess. That is understandable. Here is a question I have not seen asked yet. I don't understand how so many people can have so many questions yet NONE of these questions are ever addressed.
Why does the "official" story get countless articles and air-time from the media but nothing of this subject? It is very suspicious to say the least. Please just answer me that. There is obvious questions that people want investigated. Material of events actuality covering all subject areas, including politics, foreign affairs etc. Includes content generated by News.
I would have given you the benefit of doubt if you had gone about finding and exposing the original source of the premature "breaking news", like any serious investigative journalist would do. Now with these two blog comments you've exposed yourself, not necessarily as part of any conspiracy, but definitely as part of the cover-up. Gina, that they are supposedly trying to address the ignoring of the collapse of WTC7 some five and a half years later should tell you all you need to know about how screamingly obvious a government conspiracy this is.
Do you think it slipped their collective mind back then? Give me a break. I'm aware of a few problems with "Loose Change", but you now ad " Mysteries" to your list of movies with "many mistakes". What is wrong with you people?! You report the mysterious collapse of a building 20 minutes before it actually happens and you expect us to believe you guys didnt have some form of foreknowledge?
Everyone knows Loose Change is filled with errors even the creators know that. That is why they are making a final cut. Please do continue. No, you are not part of a conspiracy. You don't have to be. It seems more like you are a pawn. Who in the world could know a building would collapse, so certainly?
Especially when it's unprecedented Those of us with half a brain don't believe you. It is quite sad what you have become over on that side of the Atlantic. It was bad enough that the US became a fascist state-we are a young country, haven't had foreign enemies invade us, our people are fairly ignorant. I expected more from Europeans. I notice that no other European governments or press are speaking up about the obvious lies of A truly sad world it has become, we that read "", you traitors to humanity have no conscience. Oh, you "nonbelievers", pull your heads out.
We Truthers will have to take over your pitiful realities. Here's how the BBC can make amends. Track down the firefighters who were allegedly warning of the impending collapse of Building 7. Interview them and have them give a detailed explanation of why they would have been specifically concerned about the structural integrity of Building 7, given the fact that fires have never brought down a steel frame building and that we know of no similar warning regarding the other far more seriously damaged buildings of the WTC complex.
Were they surprised by the manner in which the building collapsed? If not, why not? What did they see that day and what in their background knowledge of building design would have allowed them to predict such a thing? Now, my dear Gina. Are you seriously trying to compare the work of BBC journalists to a couple of college kids working without a budget from their computers? That would be shameful if it wasn't so laughable. Particularly since Dylan Avery et.
There is a lot of home work to be done by the BBC. Come up with something real! No story telling anymore! Who first told the news services that the building was about to collapse? What was the initial source? Why did they think a steel structure building would collapse due to fire? That's unheard of, you know. Dig deeper, Mr. Do your job. Put some people on this who can study it for more than one lousy week. What we are seeing in is the separation of humanity into 2 groups: the sheep and the goats.
Sheep not meant here in the perjorative sense. The goats will fight tooth and claw to supppress the truth because they are without truth or decency as spiritual beings. The WTC7 demolition looks a lot like those old hotels in Las Vegas collapsing into the sands of time. This is the type of explanation that arises when there are more fingers to push the "Save" button than there are fingers feverishly trying to employ the "delete" button. The truth is that without all those save fingers, there would be no explanation at all from the BBC.
Just more disappeared video and silence. Come on folks.. Although publically funded, they generate many millions selling programmes and merchandising. And today they tied up a major deal with Google. For all their pompous and self-righteous delusion of journalistic integrity and impartiality, they are hugely conservative by nature and their function is to maintain the status quo.
We forget that the BBC Iraq reporting was always solidly pro-war. A comprehensive study by Media Tenor, the non-partisan institute, analysed the war coverage of some of the world's leading broadcasters and found that the BBC allowed less dissent than all of them, including the US networks. So Richard Porter's right, there's no story here, there never really has been, move along now, the BBC will warn us if anything bad is going to happen.
We can trust them. They are our moral guardians, teaching our young, supporting communities, watching over us. They are consumate professionals, the world's best broadcasting organisation, trusted across the globe. Move on now, this is where it ends, there's no story here. Like the American media, you continue to shirk your responsibility to the people to inform and enlighten them, rather you prefer to deceive and dupe them.
At what point did the integrity of the BBC slip away? When did you change from the seeker of truth to the purveyor of propaganda? And why, now that you are discredited, do you continue to duck and dive and to advance the increasingly obvious BIG LIE? Of course, your complicity has cost the lives of countless innocents and to admit the truth exposes your blood-soaked hands.
But the sources would have had everything to gain in shaping the media's perception of what exactly happened to WTC Keep in mind that not only did the report state that the building had collapsed, in the affirmative and without qualifiers, but also contained information as to WHY it collapsed "weakened" , the precise number of storeys, that there were no casualties etc. Whoever issued that pre-scripted "breaking news" and dispersed it to the media didn't want reporters and anchors to even begin to speculate.
The cock-up was that this report was released too early, and it's thanks to BBC's innocence and unfamiliarity with the New York skyline that this is now public knowledge. CNN's Aaron Brown, who received the same information but realised it couldn't be right in mid-sentence, managed to somehow wiggle his way through his segment.
The cut of the live feed just about 10 minutes before the actual event is another smoking gun in need of further investigation. Was it a mere coincidence oh - yet another one! If the latter, who had the capability to do so? Okay, so your excuse is that the BBC News doesn't know how to do it's job because everybody was confused. So, you guys get your news from other news agencies, if that was the case how come the BBC were the only ones reporting the collapse 20 minutes to it actually happening.
You still are avoiding the question, who was the source of your information? I find it extremely hard to believe your excuses since you can clearly see the building in the background, so if it was a mistake as you guys claim that means there should be some reporters being fired here for messing up the most important event of the century so far. You report the the WTC-7 had already fallen when it was still clearly standing, and your "explanation" is that other BBC outlets were doing the same?
Where did these erroneous reports originate? So far you have written two articles about this, but have come no closer to answering the fundamental question. Yes, it might have been local reports. It might have been a wire service. It might even have been some random guy who saw a "bulge. You are supposed to be a news organization, not a PR damage control firm. Why is my BBC license fee being used to research and respond to these halfwit tin-foil hat buffoons? It's going to be hilarious to watch all this new evidence to be put in with the other evidence and have you try to fob that off Why don't you want to disclose who made your news agency look like the south end of a northbound horse?
Now, I never even thought of accusing BBC of being part of any conspiracy until you brought it up. Since you keep denying something you were not accused of, I have to wonder what's up with that? This reminds me of the time when I stole a piece of grape bubble gum when I was 3 and told my mother, before she even accused me that I didn't steal the bubble gum. Is your ad hominem attack from the blog posts you made intended to squelch any and all questions by any and all people who want to know who your source is?
Is it to incite those who have disdain for "conspiracy theorists" to come to your aid by focusing on conspiracy as opposed to honest people asking you an honest question? Being labeled a conspiracy nut has long lost it's punch and I suggest that you grow up and act like the representative of a respected news agency you are supposed to be.
Your boss needs to take a look at the foolishness you have put forth this week and put someone else on this issue since it appears that you are not capable of coherent discourse on the matter. And you lack the will to bring it to a satisfactory close. Even if there wasn't a story before, your posts are creating one. And as others have said, people are not going to shut up about this, even if you choose to ignore the issue, so it is not up to you, sir. Compare the number of responses you guys get on this issue than any of the other editorial blogs.
Think about it. This topic is what people want to talk about. However, I'd like to put forth one question: As people apparently knew or at least strongly believed that WTC7 was going to collapse, how is it possible that we still don't know why it collapsed? Let alone why it collapsed nearly in a free fall time?
Quote from that report: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.
Even if NIST will one day finish their report and present a possible theory of the reason of the collapse, this will not explain the foreknowledge. On a day to day basis it may manifest itself as a cultural self censorship, but the reality is - the BBC has to keep Her Majesty's Government happy. If there ever was a grassroots mass poitical movement in the UK that mirrored those in Venezuela or the Ukraine and truly challenged the powers that be - the "progressive, humanist" BBC would be the first weapon weilded by the establishment to undermine dissent.
Who knows, in just a few years, people with the views expressed in this comment section could well be described by a presentable and attractive newsreader with a calm, measured voice as "terrorist sympathisers.
Answer this question please. Why was there no follow up after WTC7 actually fell? You and other news outlets reported a building collapsing 30 minutes early but none of you so called news outlets even mentioned you made a mistake. Why was no one after WTC7 really collapsed apologizing to the audience for the mistake? By not saying anything and pretending as if you didn't report it early you have made yourself a target.
Not a single one of these people believed then, or believes now, that the buildings at Ground Zero were destroyed by a controlled demolition. It seems that the farther away people live from a traumatic event, the easier it is for them to believe fantastic things about it. It is important to remember that it was known at the time that all the Trade Center site buildings were built over a huge cofferdam - known to engineers who worked on the Trade Center complex or had maintained it by the slang term of "The Bathtub.
But, as visitors to the cleared Trade Center site can still see, this is a huge cofferdam, which is several blocks in extent north and south, and dozens of feet deep. It was the few of its kind ever used in skyscraper construction and was meant to compensate for the possibility that much of the ground around Manhattan Island's borders was not quite as stable as it should be, because it had originally been underwater and had been reclaimed with landfill down the centuries.
Likely, much of that concern was communicated to the many reporters on the ground that horrific day in a confused fashion and that may account for media reports which seem to anticipate the last major building collapse which for some reason is now the main preoccupation of conspiracy theorists.
Richard, Perhaps it's time for you to you take an 'early retirement' to 'spend more time with your family'. Your response to the many valid and pointed questions is, quite frankly, very sad.. I have posted about 6 comments, none of which you or your 'gatekeepers' have had the decency to publish.. I would make a suggestion Would make very interesting viewing and judging by the number of posts here would break the all-time record of viewers being Den telling Angie about a divorce in Eastenders or the Morecambe and Wise Xmas Show from time immemorial.. How has the BBC descended to this farcical situation?
Hang your head in shame Mr Porter.. In , the New York Times reported that Larry Silverstein leased WTC 7, but first had to reinforce the structure in order to house his high tech operation. Quoting from the article:. MORE than tons of steel - requiring 12 miles of welding - will be installed to reinforce floors for Salomon's extra equipment. This is why this building was chosen for New York's emergency operations bunker.
Yet WTC buildings closer the the towers WTC5 and 6 were much more severely damaged, not reinforced, engulfed in flames and had to be professionally demolished several days later. Someone knew that WTC7 was coming down and offered the official explanation as to why as well. Find out who prematurely put out that press release and you will find out one person who knew of the plan to take it down. Who was it Richard? I would like to ask Guliani the same question as he is on tape predicting it's future collapse as well. Thats right folks, nothing to see here, move along.
Those of us who follow world events realized a long time ago the msm "news" is simply entertainment for the masses, the main aim being not to inform but to sell soap.
Legend of the Melting Towers
How lamentable that there is no such thing as investigative journalism in the western world anymore. How many stories a day do you kill in fear of your advertisers? Whatever happened to speaking truth to power? I hope they pay you well Mr Porter. The symetrical implossion of WTC 7 at near gravity speed could only have been caused by a planned demolition.
I MUST point out something that nobody seems to have considered. That the footage is faked. I find it very difficult to believe that only one person on the planet had recorded this.. No way. Everybody was recording that day. The window panes in back of the reporter would make it easier to install earlier footage from the point of her dialogue. Another thing, she keeps stepping to the left in front of the 7 building to show the smoke, yet she's talking about the 7 building and seemingly pointing toward the smoke of the other collapsed towers or what was emanating from the basement of building 7.
That does'nt make sense. Why would she continually step in front of the subject matter? Unless the background that is there now is not the background that was there when the report was aired. I admit that in this point in time I think the video was faked. I question who originally posted it and their timing.
Why now? Hold on to straw despite all evidence telling you that straw is just a figment of your imagination. Here are their current collapse theories. Vertical progression of the initial local failure occurred up to the east penthouse, and as the large floor bays became unable to redistribute the loads, it brought down the interior structure below the east penthouse; and.
Triggered by damage due to the vertical failure, horizontal progression of the failure across the lower floors in the region of floors 5 and 7 that were much thicker and more heavily reinforced than the rest of the floors resulted in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure. This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation.
NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements. I guess Osama snuck in and planted the explosives?
Does he still work for the CIA? The mass media is worthless.. You are part of the conspiracy because you failed doing your work: instead of reporting, asking questions, and verifying facts, you and other mass media outlets degraded the profession to a propaganda instrument. You only repeat what is given to you by press agencies and governments. Nothing more. No questions asked. There are thousands of unanswered questions around these catastrophes, but instead of asking the authorities for acceptable answers, the media just wash our brains with propaganda they get from them.
This is your failure, this is your crime, this is your part of the conspiracy. And that's true regardless if the crimes were executed by the alleged Arabic terrorist or anyone else. Even if it happened exactly as the authorities claim what everyone doubts , even then it is all a conspiracy you take part in , because the attacks was abused for starting illegal wars, power grab, and suppression of civil liberties.
And here you failed again to ask questions and haunt the responsible authorities until they resign and quit their jobs. It is the fault of the media who has the access to the authorities and can ask them question, that the question are still unanswered, 5 year later. It is your fault that conspiracy theories spread more and more.
If there were satisfactory answers, there would be no need for conspiracy theories. But when the passport of the ringleader terrorist Atta was miraculously found in the rubble, I woke up and realized there must be something very wrong if the media is able to feed us with such evident propaganda. Since then the things got only worse - more and more questions popped up every day. Where were you, Richard? Why did not you ask how is it possible that a paper passport survives such a terrible crash without any damage, while all black boxes evaporate? Why did not you ask how is it possible that the WTC7 collapsed in a perfectly symmetrical implosion, Richard?
Why did not you ask why the terrorists took a luggage full of flight manuals and Korans, and conveniently "lost" it during checkout so that it could be found? Well, it has no sense to continue - there are not 20 or 50 of such uncleared questions, there are hundreds and thousands of them.
There will be no peace until we know the answers. So Richard, I am sorry, but you are part of the conspiracy. You are guilty of the misinformation. Honest mistakes or not, you did nothing to bring us the truth. Not that I know what the truth is, but you did absolutely nothing to help us getting it. Oh one last thing, I notice a lot of 'cock-ups' regarding posts, please be good enough to allow democratic exchanges- surely you agree with democracy, Richard?
Problem is, there are way too many holes in the official story. It's a real conundrum no matter how you look at it. It's difficult to believe the official conspiracy but it's just as difficult to accept the whole "inside job" scenario. In a normal catastrophe the authorities refuse to be drawn about what happened in the first few hours or days, they refuse to be drawn. A myth was deliberately created. That this is true can be divined from a glance at the TV footage of the first hour. Unless he lived above the studio he would have needed to leave home to get there before the first plane struck.
All over the world, the myth appeared within hours because it was deliberately fed in by disinformation merchants. Despite the protestations of the BBC, and the scoffing of those who have so studiously not bothered to look at the evidence, this image of the BBC reporter standing in front of the skyline and reporting the collapse of Building 7 half an hour in advance will never go away. It is like turning up footage of the second gunman on the grassy knoll. And then losing it. You've now stated that the information probably came from "one or more of the news agencies. So if it's not too much trouble,maybe you could try to find out which one and maybe even where they got the information from The Conspirators would indeed have been interested in spreading word that Bldg.
Remember, no plane hit it, which begs the question, why the hell would it come down? But they had to bring it down, because it was wired with explosives and it was one of their main objectives to begin with. Surely flight 93 was meant to hit it but failed to do so, which must have led to some confusion and anxiety.
When it was decided that they were going to "pull it", they needed to plant some seeds of expectation-make it seem like a logical yet not particularly noteworthy ripple effect of the attack. My post will be number about 48 in the series. It's embarrassing. Thanks for the debunking links Matthew we'll be sure to look those up! This whole episode stinks 'it seems' or so it has been reported by someone else that we don't really know but we trust what they are saying! And we have promised not to tell on them!
Then, pray tell, why did you put out the propaganda piece in a failed attempt to debunk any effort by honest people to find out what happened on ? The conspiracy mob has it's clown-like vocal minority, but many if not most just want rational answers to fairly sensible questions.
We live in an age of PR, marketing, legalese, rhetoric and spin. It can be difficult to figure out which institutions are providing honest, informed, reliable info from those focussed on share value, trying to alter perceptions ultimately in self interest. I've always considered the BBC among the former, with it's public-funded charter giving it a level of journalistic freedom. September 11th is one of those generation defining events. Everyone remembers where they were when they heard. It's natural that people would take a historical interest in the finer details of the story.
I think the conspiracy theories emerge when people don't feel that the questions they have are being voiced by the media. They find themselves in a story full of locked doors, and start to guess what must lay behind. I still trust that if the BBC had the keys, you would unlock the doors for us, and that you are seekers of information, not guardians of it. What doesn't impress me is the fact that there aren't a stream of pro-BBC replies and 'sympathetic to the official story' posts to Mr Porter's blogs.
You say it is your policy to keep "roughly one third" of all your output. I'm not entirely clear on this concept, I must admit. When are these decisions made? One third of a week's output? A month's? A year's? Exercising due diligence would suggest whatever made up the one third of output from, say, the month of September , everything from the 11th would be in there. Does it seem remotely competent or responsible to you to have tossed or misplaced any of it? Another question: Could you have addressed this item without having the original footage in your possession?
You had parallel material, so your initial statements insinuating that you would need to see the footage in question in order to "clear up the issue one way or another" must seem like stalling to many people. Was it to buy time? You return three days later with a very vague timeline about the reporting of other organizations and other BBC broadcasts as if this somehow qualifies as a source, when what you should be doing is assuring us a real investigation is under way, because Mr.
Porter, whether you like it or not, this is news now. Everything about that day will be scrutinized, and shrugged shoulders won't make questions disappear. Who made the judgement call that had everyone so convinced this collapse was imminent? This is the report you should have been working on, instead of writing a blog entry to fend off E-mails. Why do you even mention this? This has no bearing on what was known at the time of your broadcast. These reports you cite, regarding the "course of the day," appear to be a red herring.
Who was telling Mr. Esler this? Where did probable collapse turn into "collapsed? Who was their source? We want you to act like objective journalists and investigate your own reporting. If you don't make up in truth what you tried to explain away with incompetence, a dark and lasting stain will be left on your organization.
This is the time to prove yourself responsible, or else suffer a scar inflicted by the growing independent media. I am not a "conspiracy theorist". Atleast I never thought I was. I watched the clip in question and I could not find a smoking gun. It was mildly suspiciouse but I could explain most of away. However after reading Mr Porter's explanations, I beginning to think something is going on.
The explanations simply do not compute. A very good attempt and better than last time but I am still unconvinced, sorry. I am not a conspiracy theorist, or 'fantasist' as someone called it. By the way,to the man who posted that, look up the meaning of the two words in future before you go splashing them about. The term is 'theorist'. It just makes more grammatical sense. If it is perfectly innocent and it may well be then please someone at the BBC make a public statement on television during the main news.
Yes, people may still not believe what is said and are unlikely to but to people like myself who where on the fence before they saw this, keeping it quiet looks very suspicious. Come on BBC your name is being dragged through the mud here. Mr Porter please quit stonewalling. As simple as the films showing the hit on the Pentagon. Oops sorry. This is all quite humorous. Remember that the media is just a magicians act creating a story with sleight of hand. Occasionally the trick becomes accidentally exposed as in the case of the premature Bldg 7 announcement.
The media does no investigation but only mimicks whatever it is told to say. This story is a perfect example of that fact. No I don't believe the BBC is part of a conspiracy. I do blame them for providing substandard journalism during the lead up to the Iraq war and allowing the lies of Bush and Blair to go unchallenged but that's another topic.
Full text of "9/11 Debris: An Investigation of Ground Zero"
What's really odd to me is that right up until the collapse of buildings 1 and 2 there was never an event of a steel frame building collapsing. Right up until the tragic event emergency crews and building security personal were trying to get people to stay in place which was the policy for fighting fires in skyscrapers. There was recorded message that played over all the security loud speakers in both of the buildings instructing that persons return to their office or desk.
Now my question why was it common knowledge among the press that buildings were in danger of and would eventually collapse when engineers and emergency professionals believed the opposite? Why did the media "expect" the most reinforced building in the complex and one not hit by any airplane to collapse? Something is still amiss. We're still waiting. What do you do with all the old media content? If you just discard it, I would really appreciate if you would forward all coverage of to me. Someone should really keep this material. A media organization that trusts governments, foreign or domestic, are of little use to the people.
Another poster asked this valid question, "Does following this incorrect information trail not stir some interest in anyone in your organization? Shouldn't the media be skeptical of all those who have authority over people, money, and weapons? I do not believe the media should just jot notes when government agencies speak. I think they should continuously research the facts and follow leads so they can pursuit essential questions for the people. If September 11 was just a massive "cock-up" by the government and the media, then why did no one lose their job?
In this Orwellian time in which we live, the people who ask relevant questions are the dissidents; they are the ones who incur the wrath of power; they alone are ridiculed for seeking truth. This is an excellent article becuase it shows just how desperate the BBC have become and just how exposed they now look. Maybe on a slow news day we may just about believe that you lost the tapes - but one of the most defining global events of this century and you don't even know if they were lost or destroyed? That is a scandal in itself. Who has been disciplined because of this?
And no - this is the first time I have heard of one of the most secure and strongly built and reinforced buildings "bulging". It was so well constructed I would have happily gone on there for a 2 week holiday whilst it burned I am so confident it would not have collapsed. Although now we have we now know that buildings can defy the laws of physics so that is now not an option! We have seen the raging inferno - a small flame coming out of two or three windows. Not the raging inferno you imply. You conflate legitimate questions with 'accusations of conspiracy'.
The legitimate questions will continue apace. I am a Yank. That is not the point. The point is that in a year history of skyscraper construction. So, so easy. All righteousness did build thy arrow To shoot it straight into their lies Who would expect the mighty sparrow Could rid our world of all their kind? Rising up to break this thing From family trees the dukes do swing Just one blow to scratch the itch The laws made for and by the rich It would be easy.
That's Canuckistan for "what are you trying to say" Come on my friend What else are you hiding? And we made that decision to bury and we watched the videos disappear. You have seen the video on youtube etc, the building was brought down delibrately. The BBC merely jumped the gun in reporting it. I discussed the pertinent details with Lima by phone, and this important and suppressed story became the subject of my first article about I realized then, during the first week after , that the mainstream news media was ignoring and covering up important information and evidence about the terrorist attacks.
There would be, for example, no reporting in the mainstream media of Israeli involvement or prior knowledge of the attacks. And this was just the beginning of the censorship the controlled media was to impose on the events of The possibility that these men could be Israeli intelligence agents involved in a spectacular "false flag" terror attack was discussed in my article that went to print in the American Free Press on September 20, It was the only newspaper in the United States where such thoughts could openly be expressed.
Months later, Forward , a well known New York-based Jewish newspaper, confirmed that Urban Moving Systems, the Weehawken, New Jersey-based "moving" company that the men worked for, was actually an Israeli intelligence front operation and that at least two of the men, evidently the Kurzberg brothers, were known agents of Mossad , Israel 's military intelligence agency. Dominic Suter, the Israeli "owner" of the company and a prime suspect, was somehow allowed to flee to Israel after the Federal Bureau of Investigation had initially interviewed him, but before they could interrogate him a second time.
He has not been extradited to the United States since. After being held for 10 weeks, the five Israelis were sent back to Israel on visa violations. Ellner, Marmari, and Schmuel appeared on an Israeli television show, without the Kurzberg brothers, in November Three of the Israeli agents arrested on appeared on Israeli television in November and admitted that their mission had been to document the attacks. One would think that such a revealing public admission by a suspect, claiming prior knowledge of the terror attack and saying that his purpose "was to document the event" would be extremely newsworthy information in the United States.
Sadly, this was not the case. Rather than discuss the evidence, the mainstream media has constructed and defended an unproven version of events in which the blame is assigned to nineteen Arabs with ties to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida. Indications of Israeli involvement in were conspicuous from the beginning. Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister and leader of the right wing Likud Party, actually said that he viewed as a positive development.
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel , Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, "It's very good. Benjamin Netanyahu right and Ehud Olmert are Israeli politicians from the extreme right-wing Likud party, which grew out of the Zionist terror organization, the Irgun.
Olmert, then mayor of Jerusalem, made a secret visit to New York City the day before the terror attacks. Asked what the attacks meant for U. Netanyahu predicted that the attack would "strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror of so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror. Prior knowledge of the attacks clearly indicates complicity in the murder of some 3, people.
Journalists, like myself, who challenge the official version with evidence and facts are marginalized as "conspiracy nuts. The level of the personal attacks against me increased dramatically in August , when a police assault by three unidentified heavily-armed men resulted in my right elbow being fractured and my being unjustifiably shocked with 50, volts from a police device known as a TASER. This outrageous and illegal assault occurred at my home in front of my wife and eight-year-old daughter. I was taken to jail and subsequently charged by the police with resisting arrest and aggravated assault, both misdemeanor charges.
In the Chicago system nearly everyone in such a situation is forced to plead guilty and accept the sentence meted out by the judge. I refused to plead guilty, however, and spent nearly one year trying to defend myself against the baseless charges and malicious prosecution. My expert witness and evidence were not allowed to be presented by the Cook County judge, Hyman Riebman, a Zionist Jew. Having seen that there was no way to obtain justice in the corrupt court system, I was compelled to leave Chicago with my family before the date of sentencing.
It would have been irresponsible for me to allow this criminal system to cause more harm to me and my family than it already had. Odigo Warnings. Many Israelis were evidently forewarned of the attacks through an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. This story, which presents the clearest evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the U. According to the published reports, Israel-based employees of Odigo reported having received warnings of an imminent attack at the World Trade Center hours before the first plane hit the north tower.
Odigo, an Israeli-owned company, had its U. Two weeks after , Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did — almost to the minute. Four thousand Israelis were expected to have been working at the World Trade Center on , yet only one was reported to have died at the complex.
Based on the Israeli government figure that 4, Israelis were expected to have been at the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message of warning. Odigo, which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called "People Finder" which allows a user to send an instant message to a large group based on a common characteristic, such as Israeli nationality.
The message was probably sent in Hebrew. The Internet address of the sender of the warning was allegedly given to the FBI. Two months later it was reported that the FBI was still investigating the matter. These two news stories about the fake Israeli "movers" and the Odigo messages, which clearly indicated that some Israelis had very specific prior knowledge of the attacks, were published in American and Israeli newspapers shortly after Had the recipients of these Odigo instant messages contacted the New York police department, thousands of lives could have been saved.
The question that has not been asked is, why didn't they? Cui Bono? There were several early indicators that Israelis were involved in and that it was a spectacular "false flag" terror attack designed to serve as a casus belli to drag the United States into the "War on Terror. Netanyahu, it should be noted, is the author of several books which call for the western nations to engage in a global "War on Terror.
The "terrorists" that Netanyahu wants the West to wage war on, however, all happen to be the people and states opposed to Israel 's illegal occupation of Palestinian land. I approached the investigation with a twenty-five year history of living in and following the events of the Middle East.
- Day of Judgement and Ten Other Stories!
- Cat & Fiddle: a novel.
- Stop, Drop, and Cover.
My academic emphasis was on Palestine and Israel. After the first U. Fate brought me into the proximity of another mass disaster on the morning of September 28, , when I arrived by ship in Sweden and learned that the Baltic ferry named Estonia had sunk during the night with victims lost at sea. My wife's first husband, a famous Estonian singer named Urmas Alender, was among the missing.
While it was abundantly clear that something much more explosive than a "monster wave" had sunk the ferry, the Swedish government and media pretended that natural forces had caused the catastrophe. In the process of investigating what happened in the ferry disaster, I came to realize that a modern "democratic" state, like Sweden , could actually be complicit in the cover-up of the mass murder of hundreds of its own citizens. I attended the final sessions of the government agency NTSB involved in investigating the "crash" of Flight and was appalled at the obvious cover-up of the facts. I watched how three Jewish members of the board completely dominated the NTSB final sessions and how the testimonies of more than eyewitnesses, who had testified to having seen a streaking object hitting the aircraft in flight, were categorically dismissed because, according to a young Jewish member of the board, based on the time of the observations, all of the witnesses must have been drunk and hallucinating.
After the two-day presentation of the NTSB findings there was no press conference or session allowing for questions from the media or public. This was clearly another cover-up. With this background I approached the events of Well aware of the history of false-flag terror, the overwhelming Zionist influence in government and media, and dishonest official investigations into recent mass disasters, I was a natural skeptic from the start. Evidence of Explosions Ignored. The administration of George W. Bush rushed the nation and its allies into war in Afghanistan within one month of the attacks using the unsolved crime as the casus belli for an overt act of aggression that had been planned long before.
The war against the government of Afghanistan , called Operation Enduring Freedom by the government and military, began on Oct. The week before the war began I wrote an article about the immense oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the new "Great Game" to gain control of these valuable energy resources.
I also wrote several articles about the long-standing business and personal ties between George W. Bush and the Bin Laden family. One month after , I wrote about how the mass media was ignoring the large number of eyewitness accounts describing explosions at the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7. The collapse of the structures resembled controlled implosions used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero said. Coming from a man who is an expert in the effects of explosives on structures, Romero's comments carried a lot of weight in my opinion.
If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points. Then suddenly, ten days after the attack, without any explanation, Romero did a complete about-face in his analysis of the collapse. A friend of mine from Brooklyn told me that he had been standing among a crowd of people on Church Street , about two blocks from the South Tower WTC 2 , when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and Even a veteran year-old fire fighter, Louie Cacchioli, told People magazine that he had witnessed explosions in the South Tower : "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers.
On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building. What is most peculiar about the eyewitness reports of explosions was that they were completely ignored by the mainstream news media, even when the reports came from their own reporters on the scene. Stephen Evans of the BBC, for example, was in the South Tower where he witnessed "a series of explosions" and felt a "big explosion, from much, much lower. How did the editors of the mass media networks in the United States and Britain make the decision not to discuss the evidence of explosions even when the information came from their own reporters on the scene?
Eyewitness reports and images of explosions were broadcast only once and then swept under the carpet. It soon became quite clear that the mass media was censoring any discussion of the evidence of explosions in the World Trade Center. Within a few weeks I realized that the media and government were working together to deceive the public about what really had happened on and that there was a conspiracy to promote a false version of events in order to gain public support for a previously planned war policy in the Middle East.
The mass media engaged in a comprehensive propaganda campaign to instill fear in the public. My family and I decided that it would be safer and more sane to live in Europe, so at the end of November, after the Thanksgiving holiday, we flew to Germany. Destruction of Evidence. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending.
At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion. Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of the Verfassungsschutz a branch of German intelligence , told me that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have needed "years of planning. These men made more sense to me than anyone in the U. As incomprehensible as it might seem, the Bush administration delayed and avoided an official investigation for as long as possible — at least until all of the evidence was destroyed.
The steel from the World Trade Center was quickly shipped to Asia where it was melted down. The evidence from the crime scene was being destroyed as quickly as possible. This was clearly criminal, yet the highest authorities in the U. Molten Metal. I consider to be an unsolved crime and have done what I can to investigate the crime using the available evidence.
In the summer of , for example, I wrote an article about the seismic data that showed unexplained spikes occurring at the beginning of each collapse. In my research into the removal of the rubble, I learned from one of the contractors and a demolition expert that molten metal had been discovered at the bottom of the rubble pile in the lower basement levels. CDI of Phoenix , Maryland. The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said.
He said molten steel was also found at WTC 7, the story building owned by Larry Silverstein, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. Loizeaux said, "If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure. The molten metal found beneath the rubble was clearly important evidence that could explain how the towers were brought down. Because each tower was held up by 47 huge box core columns, there had to be an explanation for what caused these columns to fall.
The official explanation that fires had caused the floor trusses to give way failed to explain what happened to the core columns. To explain the extremely quick collapse of the core columns, the seismic spikes and molten metal seemed to be very important clues. Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University BYU in Utah , contacted me in the summer of and asked me what I had learned about the discovery of molten metal at the World Trade Center.
I told Jones exactly what Peter Tully and Mark Loizeaux had said about the discovery of molten iron in the basements of the Twin Towers and Building 7. After studying the reports and photographs of molten metal, Jones had been able to obtain some fragments of the metal. He concluded that the fragments were primarily iron and possible evidence that Thermite had been used to demolish the buildings. The author and Professor Steven E. Jones discuss the evidence of thermite in May Encouraged by his research, I visited Professor Jones on the campus of Brigham Young University in the spring of Cahill, an expert on airborne particles.
Cahill had conducted a study of the particles contained in the thin bluish smoke that rose from the rubble for nearly four months after Asked why it took so long to begin a scientific evaluation of the air contamination that accompanied the destruction of the World Trade Center, Dr. Cahill said he had assumed that there were scores of agencies and scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City after I could not believe it was not," Cahill said.
Cahill's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the categories of ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0. The extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said.
Since the scientific data supports the theory that some form of Thermite was used to destroy the towers, the question is how it got onto the 81st floor of the south tower, where large amounts of molten metal were seen falling before the collapse? Molten iron pours out of South Tower about one minute before the tower disintegrated. The official final report of the fires does not explain what was on the 81st floor, which seems odd because this is the floor, leased by Fuji Bank, into which the airplane crashed.
A former employee of the bank came forward and told me that the bank had reinforced the floor in to support a very heavy load of computer back-up batteries. They had been put in place during the summer prior to , he said. But were they really batteries? So, what really was on the 81st floor of the South Tower? What was in these heavy "battery-looking things? And is it more than a coincidence that both planes flew directly into secure computer rooms in both towers and that both spectacular explosions showed evidence of Thermite-produced white smoke? The Cover-up Continues. Despite the legal difficulties, slander, criticism, and other setbacks, I have continued to examine the evidence from and ask the questions that demand to be answered.
The wasted lives of the thousands of victims from the terror attacks and the illegal wars that have been waged in the name of deserve to be honored with the truth, not a pack of lies pushed by the controlled media onto a gullible public. The truth of will certainly not be given to us on a silver platter.
It is something we will have to fight for. This chapter was originally written in February for ZeitenSchrift , a Swiss magazine. Chapter II. The Planes of A little-known and privately-held aircraft leasing company created by the Israeli military intelligence is connected to the Mossad-run airport security and passenger screening company at the center of the "false flag" terror network of I am not like those who claimed to be researchers, but who now say they have "moved beyond In May U.
How can we forget the hundreds of people who were roasted alive in the burning twin towers? How can we ignore the death and destruction that we, as a result, have wrongfully inflicted on the innocent people of Iraq , Afghanistan , Lebanon , and Palestine? Vice President Dick Cheney said the U. If we, as Americans, don't demand the truth about , who and what do we really stand for?
What does it mean to be a citizen of "the land of the free and the home of the brave" if we allow our minds and our nation to be so easily hijacked by government lies and propaganda? I cannot abide mass murder, occupation, and genocidal wars of aggression. Nor can I accept the corruption of our values and destruction of our basic American rights to suit an artificially imposed "War on Terror. Guantanamo - An affront to American values. In December , veteran German intelligence professionals told me that had been executed by a state-sponsored criminal network and had required years of planning.
Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany 's domestic intelligence service, Verfassungsschutz , told me in that "the deathly precision" and "the magnitude of planning" of the attacks would have required "years of planning. If Werthebach's analysis is correct, and I have every reason to believe it is, the official version is nothing but a pack of lies. The members of this network are dedicated to preventing the evidence from being released because it would expose the real perpetrators.
This is the only logical reason why the evidence has been suppressed, the investigation controlled, and the litigation and discovery processes obstructed. At this point, it should be clear that will never be solved by the federal government, politically appointed investigators, law enforcement agencies, or the corrupt courts. These controlled agencies, like the Zionist-controlled media, are only interested in controlling the information and preventing the real truth from being revealed. This crime will only be solved by concerned and dedicated independent researchers.
It was carefully planned years in advance and carried out for one strategic purpose: to kick-start the Zionist-planned "War on Terror. Likewise, the Zionist media moguls, who dominate the U. An Israeli official named Oded Yinon revealed the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the entire Middle East into ethnic mini-states in the early s. The plan for a global "War on Terror" to accomplish this goal has been articulated since the mids ad nauseam by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister of the extreme right-wing Likud party. Only by exposing the terrorist masterminds behind will we reveal the criminals behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the epidemic of "false flag" terrorism that plagues the world.
I have seen this pattern in earlier cover-ups. The same pattern was used with the sinking of Estonia in the Baltic Sea and the U. In each case, the three critical phases of the cover-up: investigation and access to evidence, media interpretation of the event, and related litigation, were all tightly controlled to prevent any meaningful discovery of what had really caused the disaster.
Bernard S. Loeb, Director of Aviation Safety at the NTSB, summarized the TWA investigation: "We cannot be certain that this, in fact, occurred, but of all the ignition scenarios we considered, this scenario is the most likely. The people who are preventing the discovery of the facts in such cases are actually complicit in covering-up crimes of mass murder. Logically, there can be no reason for dedicated Zionists to obstruct the investigation of other than to conceal the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the crimes. Chertoff went on to head the Department of Homeland Security, where he continued to control access to the evidence through the Sensitive Security Information SSI program.
The FBI, for example, under the command of the Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff, is responsible for the confiscation of the crucial evidence from , evidence which has been withheld to this day. This evidence includes video tapes of the Pentagon attack and physical pieces from the different aircraft involved.
This evidence is critical to prove what happened and which aircraft were involved in the attacks - but the FBI has refused to release this evidence. Neither President George W. Bush nor the U. Congress demanded that they do so. The destruction and suppression of crucial evidence from and the lack of a real investigation indicate that a culture of corruption and lack of transparency exist at all levels of government. The appointed federal judges Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey, and the former assistant attorney general Michael Chertoff, who now heads Homeland Security, have not worked since to hide the critical evidence and block discovery in order to protect fanatical Arab Muslims or conspiratorial Jesuits.
The efforts of these dedicated Zionists have been exerted to protect Israel , the foreign state to which they are wholeheartedly devoted. The players who are involved in obstructing justice are known. Patriotic Americans must not abandon the pursuit of the truth.
For those who died on and in its aftermath, for our nation and our posterity, we are obliged to find and expose those who are responsible for the crimes and cover-up of I have pursued the leads of Israeli involvement simply because the evidence indicates that the Israeli military and intelligence had prior knowledge and involvement in The text message warnings of the attacks sent over the Mossad-controlled Odigo instant messaging system several hours prior to the attacks are further evidence of Israeli prior knowledge. Furthermore, the Israelis have a long history of committing "false flag" terror attacks, particularly against American targets.
If the evidence indicated that Saudis, Pakistanis, or even Jesuits were behind the attacks, I would investigate them.
The evidence, however, points to Israelis being involved - so I look there. There has been no independent investigation of done by the controlled media other than Carl Cameron's now deeply-buried four-part series on FOX News in December Think about this for a minute. The mass media in the land of the "free press" has not done any independent investigation about the crime of the century. The evidence of Israeli involvement in is too obvious, so senior editors in the controlled media don't let their journalists even approach the subject.
The journalists of the "free press" in the United States are, unfortunately, confined to the same " Auschwitz of the Mind" as the American public they write for. They know very well that to touch the subject of Israeli involvement in would be like touching a live wire. Likewise, when it comes to tracking the Israeli criminal network that has operated in the United States for decades, the U.
The extent of Zionist control over the U. The mass media has effectively prevented most Americans from understanding who is really behind the false flag terror attacks of , and, by extension, the illegal and genocidal wars in Afghanistan , Palestine , Lebanon , and Iraq. The controlled media has also left Americans with an extremely distorted view of the Middle East, Zionism, and the history of the Zionist state, Israel. Jews from Eastern Europe created an empire of their own in Hollywood in the early s and have influenced how Americans see the world ever since.
Israel is a nation which was founded by terrorists, ruthless men with histories of committing genocidal crimes and false flag terror attacks. Israel was created in in Palestine on land that had been "ethnically cleansed" of its indigenous Christian and Muslim inhabitants. Ariel Sharon, the former prime minister who has been in a coma since January 4, , is a prime example of an Israeli terrorist. Sharon came to power in early , about the same time as George W. Bush, some eight months before Sharon has supervised numerous terrorist atrocities, such as the massacre in Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, in which thousands of innocent people were massacred.
Sharon is a Zionist extremist who believes that every Jew should live in Israeli-occupied Palestine. Realistically, what else besides terrorism and bloodshed should one expect from such fanatical and genocidal terrorists? Ariel "Arik" Sharon smiling on left with Moshe Dayan and members of his notorious "anti-terror" Unit which committed a number of atrocities such as the Qibya Massacre of October in which 69 Palestinians were killed, many whose houses were blown up over their heads. Forty-five houses, a school, and a mosque were destroyed.
Sharon, a well known terrorist, became Israel's prime minister in The sons and daughters of the original Zionist terrorists have occupied the highest positions of power in the Israeli government. Tzipora Malka "Tzipi" Livni, for example, the foreign minister , is the daughter of the former terror chief of the Irgun. Tzipi Livni, 47, is the first woman to serve as Israel 's foreign minister since Golda Meir. Some think she may be the first since Ms.
Meir to be prime minister. She is also a deeply Israeli figure, the daughter of Zionist guerrillas - terrorists in some eyes - who met in the Irgun, the underground organization that fought the British and the Arabs, and that blew up the British headquarters in the King David Hotel in , killing 91 people. Her father, Eitan, was the Irgun's head of operations, and on his gravestone is the map of Greater Israel, extending over both sides of the Jordan River.
Livni was part of the Irgun mission sent to Britain in the s to kill British political and military leaders. The fact that the Israeli political leadership and military command decided to launch a vicious attack on a defenseless U. Dedicated Zionists will either deny or defend these acts of Israeli false flag terrorism as the "pragmatic" thing to do -- and attack those who disagree as anti-Semitic. False flag terror acts are an Israeli specialty, as Dr. Kaasem Khaleel points out in his book Wrongly Blamed To achieve their political goals, Zionists are dependent on terror.
These terror acts are used as a distraction. Even though the Israelis are the sources, they effectively blame others. The fabricated terror they commit is an assault on people's intelligence. Thus people are being purposely misled regarding the real source of these crimes. Judith Miller of the New York Times lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to build public opinion for the pre-planned Zionist war of aggression against Iraq. The controlled U. There are, however, many unanswered questions about the airplanes involved. There are many observations about these planes which suggest they were not the civilian airliners they are said to have been.
The plane that struck the South Tower , for example, had unusual shapes, bulges, and holes, which have led many analysts to believe it was a Boeing refueling tanker that had been disguised as a United Airlines passenger jet. Images of the plane that struck the South Tower. On these engines and landing gear are many numbered time-tracked parts which could prove precisely which aircraft they had been put on and when they had been serviced, but the FBI has refused to present this evidence to make its case.
Why wouldn't the FBI present this evidence if it had it? The jet engine that landed on Murray Street contains specific numbered and time-tracked parts which would identify exactly which aircraft struck the World Trade Center. Why has the U. The only possible explanation for the FBI's failure to present this evidence is that the evidence does not match the planes they claim hit the buildings or "crashed" in Pennsylvania.
Given the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge, the obvious questions arise: Did the Israelis have the means to carry off such a complex operation? And if they had the means, is there a link between their capability and the events of ? The answer to both questions is yes. The Israeli military and its intelligence agencies have long had the capability to convert and disguise large-body aircraft in the United States , and their companies that do this kind of work are connected to International Consultants on Targeted Security ICTS , the Israeli airport security company that is a prime suspect in the "false flag" terrorism.
ICTS was a key defendant in the litigation until Judge Hellerstein allowed them to be dismissed from the case in May The Israeli military has spawned several aircraft leasing and maintenance companies in the United States since the late s. Israel Aircraft Industries is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Defense Ministry, which produces and maintains planes and missiles. As a matter of fact, I spoke with Shalom Yoran, the Israeli chairman of this now defunct Israeli company, about six hours before three undercover police arrived at my house and, without cause or provocation, TASERed me and broke my elbow in front of my family on August 15, I had come across Shalom Yoran's name while researching Amit and Naftali Yoran, the suspicious young Israelis who oversaw cyber-security for the U.
Shalom Yoran has an extremely suspicious and unusual profile for an Israeli immigrant to the United States. He was in the original Israeli air force of and is a founder and former head of Israel Aircraft Industries. Yoran was instrumental in building the IAI into an internationally recognized company and the largest industry in Israel. Yoran became the co-founder and head of Israel Aircraft Industries and Bedek. Before Yoran emigrated to the United States , which is very unusual for Israelis of his age and with his high-level military background, he had spent the previous ten years as senior vice president of IAI and as president of IAI's parent company, Bedek.
Israelis like Yoran don't usually come to America as immigrants - they are sent there on a mission. Israel Aircraft Industries was established in as Bedek Aviation Company, five years after the establishment of the State of Israel. Today, Bedek is the senior group of Israel Aerospace Industries and specializes in aircraft operation, conversion, maintenance, and overhaul. In , when Yoran "left" Bedek and IAI at the unusually young retirement age of fifty, the corporation had 22, employees, of which 4, worked in the Bedek Division.
In his on-line biographies, Yoran says he was appointed to this position: "When he retired at the age of fifty [ca. In he moved to the U. The company also had an aircraft maintenance and modification plant in Smyrna , Tennessee. How could an Israeli be appointed to be president or chairman of an "American" company, unless that company were actually an Israeli company disguised as an American company?
And why would an Israeli company doing business in the United States want to disguise the fact that it is Israeli-owned in the first place? This investigative article, which involved an international team of journalists that included an Israeli, focused on the "mysterious Israeli tycoon and the Mossad, Israeli's intelligence service," and how they had provided the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin with two Boeing jetliners as part of an Israeli effort to spy on Libya.
The "big winner" and tycoon in this Mossad spying operation was Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg , "the reclusive Israeli entrepreneur at its center. Eisenberg was, as the Washington Post reported in , the central figure in the Mossad spying operation on Libya :. Atasco was put together in by executives of Israeli Aircraft Industries, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Israeli Defense Ministry that makes planes and missiles.
After the Middle East War, Israeli Aircraft, staggered by scandals, sold its share in Atasco to Eisenberg, leaving him its sole owner. Export-Import Bank, which is supposed to make loans to promote American exports. The Ex-Im Bank certainly found the right man in Eisenberg. He quickly turned into an eager customer for Pan American Airways' used Boeing s. Atasco bought 12 or 15 of the advance series "C" s that Pan Am was selling and purchased six out of ten earlier series "C" s being sold by the airline. Clay Characters for Kids.
Maureen Carlson. Urban Cinematics. Katie and the Sunflowers. James Mayhew. Eoin Devereux. The Quilts of Gee's Bend. Susan Goldman Rubin. Nana Plays. Natalie Buske Thomas. The Little Bruegel. Catherine de Duve. Chris Riddell. Speedy Publishing. Airy Plumeflights. Timothy O'Neill. Gendered Transformations. Claudia Alvares. Dawud Knuckles. Lima Bergmann. Representations of Working in Arts Education. Narelle Lemon. Arky Destefano. The Little Van Eyck. Recording Memories from Political Violence. Cahal McLaughlin. Action ART. Katie: Katie and the Spanish Princess.
The Melleray Alphabet.